While relationships between students and professors aren’t unheard of, they can be a source for all kinds of problems. A professor is in a position of authority over a student, whether or not he or she is that student’s teacher or supervisor, which makes any dating arrangement tricky at best. Ultimately, if the two are consenting adults there’s no scenario where it’s OK for a high school teacher to date a current student , there’s not much anyone can do to prevent them from pursuing a romantic relationship. But expect there to be consequences. First things first: A student must be 18 years old to legally be able to consent to a relationship with an adult. Beyond that, some schools have specific rules about what to do if a student and a professor want to pursue a romantic relationship. Breaking those rules could jeopardize the professor’s job and the student’s status. If you’re at an institution where there aren’t official rules about dating, there are most likely some guidelines or unofficial community expectations. Is it frowned upon?
Consensual Relationships Policy
Jump to navigation. With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty members not to abuse, nor to seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted.
For graduate students, however, this new policy does not apply, and but practically speaking professors and students dating is a terrible idea.
Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process. As a matter of sound judgment and professional ethics, faculty members have a responsibility to avoid any apparent or actual conflict between their professional responsibilities and personal relationships with students.
Faculty have a collective responsibility to the student experience as members and representatives of the University community, and with each class of incoming students who are bound together in space and time. The faculty at the University fulfill their essential role with students in learning, research, and service environments, and do so with a commitment to honoring the highest professional and ethical standards.
An overarching goal for the context of the faculty-student relationship is to create a professional, productive, and equitable environment for independent learning and academic growth. Student well-being and the pursuit of academic excellence are central to any faculty-student relationship. At its best, the faculty-student relationship nurtures the advancement and pursuit of knowledge and can lead to life-long professional mentorships and connections. At its worst, the inherent imbalance in the power dynamic between faculty and students can lead to real or perceived exploitation of the power differential.
In all cases, a Covered Teacher defined below is prohibited from having a Covered Relationship defined below with any Learner defined below in a class, lab, field, or other setting in which the Covered Teacher has Academic or Supervisory Authority defined below over the Learner.
Does Cornell have a policy about non-romantic relationships between TAs and undergrads?
By secret-name , October 30, in The Lobby. I’ve been a member of this forum for a little while but have created this “secret-name” in an attempt to remain even more anonymous about this particularly sensitive subject. I’m dating a former undergrad professor. I spent my last semester and part of the summer working in his lab to gain experience for my grad applications. We started dating in July two months after my graduation – nothing happened before then, not even discussion of dating and plan to continue dating while I am in grad school.
A number of colleges and universities banned faculty-undergraduate dating or otherwise shored up their consensual relationship policies after the Education Department published a reminder letter about sexual harassment liability, in Other institutions had adopted such policies earlier. And while many involved in or affected by these decisions support them as preventing potential abuse, others remain critical of policing connections between consenting adults.
Fear of legal liability and increasing acknowledgement of academic power structures changed that, leading institutions to adopt a mix of policies regarding these relationships. Its rationale for doing so, stated in the policy itself, sums up much of the thinking behind blanket bans on undergraduate-faculty dating. Northwestern previously banned relationships between graduate students and faculty supervisors. There is no hardfast rule about these policies.
Somewhere in the middle of the policy mix, the University of Wisconsin System in banned faculty-student dating graduate or undergraduate where an advisory or supervisory relationship, or the potential for one, exists. Pre-existing relationships must be reported. Syracuse University is considering something similar. The latter policy was a compromise, following debate over an ealier version that would have banned dating between graduate students and professors in the same program.
Such a strict policy remains rare, since even other relatively restrictive codes allow for graduate students to date professors where no evaluative authority exits. Apart from blanket bans on dating undergraduates, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst for the first time this spring banned student-faculty dating where an advisory relationship exists.
Amorous Relationships (III.A.1)
Before he leaves, he asks his friend, the aptly named Mentor, to care for his son, Telemachus. Mentor proves a trusty counselor and teaches the young man the wisdom of the scholars and the wiles of the world. Many years pass, but Ulysses does not return home. Finally, Telemachus decides to search for his father.
Relationships with graduate students and other learners: Faculty and other academic instructional staff are prohibited from having a sexual or.
HR contacts. Employee Relations contacts. Purdue University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning, discovery and engagement take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Amorous Relationships can develop within the University community between faculty, students and staff. The disparity of power when an Amorous Relationship is between 1 a student and a faculty member, graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other University employee who has educational responsibility over the student, 2 a supervisor and subordinate, or 3 senior and junior colleagues in the same department or unit makes the individuals involved susceptible to exploitation.
Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation. The respect and trust accorded a member of the faculty by a student, as well as the power exercised by faculty in giving grades, approvals or recommendations for future study and employment, make voluntary consent by the student suspect. Those who abuse their power in the context of an Amorous Relationship where there is Educational or Employment Supervision and Evaluation violate their duty to the University community.
Voluntary consent by the student or subordinate in a romantic or sexual relationship is difficult to determine given the asymmetric nature of the power structure in the relationship.
Rutgers University to ban romantic relationships between faculty and students
The relationship between faculty1 and student is central to the academic mission of the University. No non-academic or personal ties should be allowed to interfere with the integrity of the faculty-student relationship. Consensual sexual relations between faculty and student can adversely affect the academic enterprise, distorting judgments, or appearing to do so to others, and providing incentives or disincentives for student-faculty contact that are inappropriate.
The prohibition extends to sexual relations or dating between a graduate or professional student and other students for whom they have some.
Sexual or romantic relationships may raise concerns of conflict of interest, abuse of authority, favoritism, and unfair treatment when both people are in the MIT work or academic environment, and one person holds a position of power or authority over the other. These relationships may also affect others in the work or academic environment, undermining the integrity of their supervision and evaluation as well.
These concerns exist even when the relationship is considered consensual by both individuals. In some instances, consent may not be as freely given as the more senior person in the relationship believes. Because of the possible adverse effects on the other party and on their fellow students, co-workers, colleagues, and others, the Institute prohibits all faculty, other academic instructional staff, other employees, and other non-student members of the MIT community paid or unpaid from having sexual or romantic relationships with certain MIT students and employees, whether or not the relationship is consensual.
A summary of this policy is as follows, with more detail in the noted sections:. Where this policy imposes a duty to notify and recuse, that duty falls on the person in the position of power or authority in the relationship. Where required, notification and recusal must take place as soon as practical after any action has been taken by either party to establish a sexual or romantic relationship.
Faculty, other academic instructional staff , other employees, and other members of the MIT community other than MIT students are prohibited from having a sexual or romantic relationship with any undergraduate student at MIT.
College and University Blog
This may seem like a weird topic, but it happens more often than grad students might think: professors who get… a little too close. Graduate school is an unnatural environment, and you might find that some of your own habits and actions surprise you. You might date someone completely atypical or befriend someone who has a lot of growing up to do.
Grad school can be an educational pressure cooker, where a small group of students work intimately for a couple of years under the direction of a few professors or advisers; it makes sense that some relationships become a little intense. Some professors shield students from their personal lives entirely, with no mention of a partner, spouse or children.
When they started dating, there wasn’t a rule prohibiting Steve from In April, the school extended the ban to include all graduate students.
Stay plugged into Penn with this daily newsletter rounding up all of the top headlines from top headlines from the DP, 34th Street, and Under the Button. The week’s top stories from the DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, and delivered into your inbox every Sunday morning. Subscribe to get the week’s top stories from The DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, delivered directly to your inbox. A new policy banning all sexual relations between undergraduate students and faculty members at Penn went into effect on March The announcement is not unprecedented in the world of higher education.
In fact, among other Ivy League institutions, Penn is relatively late to introduce this new policy shift. Dartmouth College, Harvard University, Yale University, Brown University, Princeton University, and Stanford University all have blanket prohibitions on undergraduate-faculty relationships for undergraduates, similar to the one Penn just implemented. Credit: Julia Schorr Cornell’s current policy, approved in , has been “a topic of concern” for the last two years, and the university has created a Consensual Relationships Policy Committee, according to the university’s website.
Yale’s policy states that undergraduates are “particularly vulnerable to the unequal institutional power inherent in the teacher-student relationship and the potential for coercion, because of their age and relative lack of maturity. The policy change also comes in the context of a wider trend in academia. A recent public survey detailed accounts of sexual harassment in academia, including five entries from students alleging sexual harassment by Penn faculty members. The five entries were made by graduate students, who a survey by the American Association of Universities says are more likely to be harassed by faculty than undergraduates.
Katie Pak, a GET-UP member in her third year at GSE, said that she did not know enough about the policy update to comment, but that she thought it was “interesting” that the change included “nothing about graduate students,” despite the ongoing campaign for improved sexual harassment policies at GSE.